婚前试爱

US judge’s halt to Pentagon's 'military company' label on WuXi AppTec proves arbitrary blacklists 'not beyond challenge': experts_我的网站

一 |     今日，CBS Sports记者Sam Quinn更新社媒，提到了布劳恩和沃特森的合约对比：          “沃特森先签后换加盟骑士，新合同四年8800万，平均年薪2200万；布劳恩去年和掘金签下五年1.25亿合约，平均年薪2500万。

二 |     

    A photo shows WuXi AppTec in the Waigaoqiao Bonded Area of the Shanghai Free Trade Zone. Photo: VCG
A US federal judge on Friday temporarily "barred the Pentagon from including Chinese biotechnology group WuXi AppTec on a list of companies believed to support Beijing's military," according to Reuters. Chinese experts said the ruling sends a positive signal for Chinese companies operating in the US, showing that Washington's arbitrary, fact-deficient national security blacklists are not beyond challenge and that firms should make greater use of legal means to defend their legitimate rights.
US District Judge James Boasberg issued an order blocking enforcement of the designation of WuXi in June after the company filed suit. WuXi in a statement welcomed the court's ruling, saying it "relieves us from the immediate adverse consequences" of the Defense Department's designation during the litigation. "We believe that the facts, as demonstrated in our court filings, will prevail after an objective and fair judicial review," a WuXi spokesperson said, according to the report. 
A South China Morning Post report noted that the ruling represents an early legal victory for one of China's largest pharmaceutical research and manufacturing service providers and a setback for Washington's expanding use of national-security restrictions against major Chinese commercial companies.
Gao Lingyun, a research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times that the Pentagon's controversial "list-first, evidence-later" approach has bred massive operational uncertainty for Chinese enterprises conducting legitimate business in the US. By arbitrarily imposing restrictive labels before presenting credible proof, Washington creates an opaque and unpredictable regulatory environment that disrupts normal commercial expectations. 
The US Department of Defense released its updated Section 1260H list on June 8, marking the first time WuXi AppTec was formally included, alongside Alibaba, Baidu, BYD and Unitree Robotics, among others. 
On June 12, WuXi AppTec announced it had filed suit against the Department of Defense in the US District Court for the District of Columbia. The company said the department's decision was erroneous and lacked factual basis or support under applicable statutes and case law.
He Weiwen, a senior fellow at the Center for China and Globalization, noted that when Chinese companies face unfair and unjustified suppression in the US, they cannot rely solely on corporate statements or diplomatic representations; they must also protect themselves through legal means. Filing suit in federal court is entirely necessary and correct, he said.
"In the past, quite a few Chinese companies had nothing to do with so-called military matters but were hit with US countervailing and anti-dumping measures. Many won their cases after appealing to the Court of International Trade. Legal recourse is an indispensable tool and one we need to take more seriously," he said.
In January 2021, Xiaomi was placed on a similar Pentagon list. The Chinese company later announced on May 26, 2021 that a US court has removed the company's designation as a military-related company and lifted all restrictions on US persons buying or holding its stock, Reuters reported. 
The designation has so far had little impact on WuXi AppTec's business. The company reported on August 3 that first-half revenue rose 38.9 percent year-on-year to 28.9 billion yuan, while net profit attributable to shareholders climbed 29.4 percent to 11.08 billion yuan — its first half-year profit above the 10-billion-yuan mark, said media reports.
When asked about US placing several Chinese technology companies including Alibaba, Tencent, BYD, on a list of firms that it says aid China's military, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said that China firmly opposes the US overstretching the concept of national security and formulating various types of discriminatory lists to go after Chinese businesses. "We urge the US to correct its wrongdoings, and stop the unwarranted suppression of Chinese businesses. China will do what is necessary to firmly protect their legitimate and lawful rights and interests," said Lin. 
。”          随后美媒lockedupjb评论：          “没有开玩笑，这份合同直接毁了掘金。

三 | ”          很明显，对于布劳恩，大多数声音都觉得五年1.25亿不合适；很难不让人提问：          布劳恩真的配得上这份合同吗？          理性来看，如果只看签约前的24-25赛季，其实这也不算什么垃圾合同。         当赛季布劳恩出战79场，其中77场首发，场均出场33.9分钟，基础数据15.4分5.2篮板2.6助攻1.1抢断，三项命中率58%+39.7%+82.7%。         作为年轻即战力，这样的进攻效率确实值得大合约；特别是对比成长速度看，前一个赛季还只是替补角色，场均7.3分3.7篮板1.6助攻，而一个休赛期后，进攻产量直接翻了一倍多。掘金愿意在他身上押注未来，确实也有迹可循。

四 |          而当赛季波普离队，球队侧翼需要有人补上短板，而布劳恩出现的也恰到好处。

五 |          但问题刚好出现在这里，掘金看好布劳恩能稳定成长；但尴尬的是，拿到大合同后，布劳恩很快遭遇伤病问题。         由于左脚踝韧带撕裂，整个常规赛布劳恩只出战44场，场均31.8分钟，场均12分4.8篮板2.7助攻，三项命中率51.9%+30.1%+78.2%。         虽然下跌幅度不大，但对于约基奇而言就不是一个小问题了。         作为球队持球核心，他的很大一部分价值就在于通过持球策应盘活队友进攻，但如果身边的人不具备足够进攻威胁，约基奇的进攻价值必然随之缩水。         特别是到了季后赛，这个问题更是被严重放大。         首轮面对森林狼，布劳恩出战6场，场均8.3分3.5篮板1.7助攻，三项命中率41.7%+42.9%+73.7%。特别是后四场比赛，布劳恩的得分分别只有2分、8分、9分、3分。

六 |          很明显，在球队需要有人站出来时，布劳恩确实做不到，甚至于在他的进攻威胁下降后，直接影响到全队进攻，这才是掘金最危险的地方。         当然，也不能把掘金问题都甩给布劳恩一人，毕竟伤病对于一位年轻球员的影响不能忽视，从这个视角看，直接把布劳恩判定为垃圾合同，也有点早了。         只是从长远视角看，掘金确实需要担忧，对于布劳恩，他未来的成长上限到底在哪里呢？          当初掘金开出五年1.25亿，并非是买单当时的布劳恩，而是看好他的未来潜力。但如果后续没能稳定进步，那么这份合同的性价比自然下降了。         特别是对比沃特森，合约问题就更明显了。

七 |          二人都属于掘金养成的年轻侧翼，但沃特森身体条件更好，攻防潜力更大，在持球和外线威胁上都高于布劳恩，甚至也比布劳恩年轻。         但尴尬的是，在给布劳恩开出五年1.25亿后，掘金给沃特森的报价只有四年7800万，这个差距难免让人质疑。         在掘金视角下，如果沃特森只值7800万，那么布劳恩的五年1.25亿，自然就是垃圾合同了。         所以，对于布劳恩和沃特森这两份合同，你如何评价呢？。

Current article:http://0lk03.yuejinhuapennuochoudengying.cyou/8td/c7v4l.html

Published on:05:24:13